1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ADKINS v. CMH HOMES INC.
 

ADKINS v. CMH HOMES INC.

Case No. 3:13-cv-32123.

WILLIAM HOWARD ADKINS and MARRIAN A. ADKINS, Plaintiff, v. CMH HOMES INC. d/b/a FREEDOM HOMES; VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC.; and JOHN DOE HOLDER, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division.

September 10, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Howard Adkins, and, Plaintiff, represented by Colten Lewis Fleu , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC., Daniel F. Hedges 1 , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC. & Lydia C. Milnes , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC..

Marrian A. Adkins, Plaintiff, represented by Colten Lewis Fleu , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC., Daniel F. Hedges 1 , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC. & Lydia C. Milnes , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC..

CMH Homes Inc., doing business as Freedom Homes, Defendant, represented by Carrie Goodwin Fenwick , GOODWIN & GOODWIN, Edward S. Sledge, IV , MAYNARD COOPER & GALE, Elise Nicole McQuain , GOODWIN & GOODWIN, James C. Lester , MAYNARD COOPER & GALE, Joseph M. Ward , GOODWIN & GOODWIN, Thomas W. Thagard, III , MAYNARD COOPER & GALE & Victoria L. Wilson , GOODWIN & GOODWIN.

Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc., and, Defendant, represented by Carrie Goodwin Fenwick , GOODWIN & GOODWIN, Elise Nicole McQuain , GOODWIN & GOODWIN, Joseph M. Ward , GOODWIN & GOODWIN & Victoria L. Wilson , GOODWIN & GOODWIN.

Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Carrie Goodwin Fenwick , GOODWIN & GOODWIN, Elise Nicole McQuain , GOODWIN & GOODWIN, Joseph M. Ward , GOODWIN & GOODWIN & Victoria L. Wilson , GOODWIN & GOODWIN.

Marrian A. Adkins, Counter Defendant, represented by Colten Lewis Fleu , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC., Daniel F. Hedges 1 , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC. & Lydia C. Milnes , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC..

William Howard Adkins, Counter Defendant, represented by Colten Lewis Fleu , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC., Daniel F. Hedges 1 , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC. & Lydia C. Milnes , MOUNTAIN STATE JUSTICE, INC..

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CHERY A. EIFERT, Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas. (ECF No. 41). Defendants have filed a response in opposition to the motion, (ECF No. 45), and Plaintiffs have filed a reply in support of their motion to quash, or in the alternative, a motion for protective order. (ECF No. 59). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases