1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SHUKLA v. SHARMA
 

SHUKLA v. SHARMA

No. 07-CV-2972 (CBA)(CLP).

DEVENDRA SHUKLA, Plaintiff, v. SAT PRAKASH SHARMA, Individually and as Director of Vishva Seva Ashram of New York; GEETA SHARMA, Individually and as Director of Vishva Seva Ashram of New York; and VISHVA SEVA ASHRAM OF NEW YORK, D/B/A SARYA DEV MANDIR, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

September 9, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Devendra Shukla, Plaintiff, represented by Sanjay Chaubey .

Sat Prakash Sharma, Defendant, represented by Daniel H. Richland , Paykin, Richland & Falkowski, P.C. & Michal Falkowski , Paykin, Richland & Falkowski, P.C..

Geeta Sharma, Defendant, represented by Daniel H. Richland , Paykin, Richland & Falkowski, P.C. & Michal Falkowski , Paykin, Richland & Falkowski, P.C..

Vishva Seva Ashram Of New York, Defendant, represented by Krishnan Shanker Chittur , Chittur & Associates, P.C. & Matthew Adam Pek , The Law Offices of Matthew A. Pek, Esq..

Vishva Seva Ashram Of New York, doing business as Sarva Dev Mandir, Defendant, represented by Ryan Gordon Blanch , The Blanch Law Firm, Daniel H. Richland , Paykin, Richland & Falkowski, P.C. & Michal Falkowski , Paykin, Richland & Falkowski, P.C..

Krishnan Chittur, Defendant, represented by Krishnan Shanker Chittur , Chittur & Associates, P.C..

Sat Prakash Sharma, Individually and as Director of Vishva Seva Ashram Of New York, Counter Claimant, Pro Se.

Geeta Sharma, Individually and as Director of Vishva Seva Ashram Of New York, Counter Claimant, Pro Se.

Vishva Seva Ashram Of New York, Counter Claimant, represented by Ryan Gordon Blanch , The Blanch Law Firm.

Devendra Shukla, Counter Defendant, represented by Sanjay Chaubey .

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

CAROL BAGLEY AMON, Chief District Judge.

Defendants Sat Prakash Sharma, Geeta Sharma, and Vishva Seva Ashram of New York ("defendants") move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) ("Rule 60(b)") to vacate the Court's January 3, 2013 Order awarding attorney's fees to defendants' trial counsel, Chittur & Associates, P.C. ("Chittur"). Defendants concede that this Court does not have jurisdiction to grant their motion because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases