2 HOUNDS DESIGN, INC. v. BREZINSKI

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-101-RJC-DCK.

2 HOUNDS DESIGN, INC., Plaintiff, v. JESSICA BREZINSKI, and USA DOG SHOP, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

August 26, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

2 Hounds Design, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Albert Peter Allan , Allan IP Litigation.

Jessica Brezinski, Defendant, represented by Ronald E. Steinvurzel , Steinvurzel Law Group & Ross Robert Fulton , Rayburn, Cooper & Durham, P.A..

USA Dog Shop, LLC, Defendant, represented by Ronald E. Steinvurzel , Steinvurzel Law Group.

USA Dog Shop, LLC, LLC, Defendant, represented by Ross Robert Fulton , Rayburn, Cooper & Durham, P.A..

USA Dog Shop, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Ronald E. Steinvurzel , Steinvurzel Law Group & Ross Robert Fulton , Rayburn, Cooper & Durham, P.A..

Jessica Brezinski, Counter Claimant, represented by Ronald E. Steinvurzel , Steinvurzel Law Group & Ross Robert Fulton , Rayburn, Cooper & Durham, P.A..

2 Hounds Design, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Albert Peter Allan , Allan IP Litigation.

USA Dog Shop, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Ronald E. Steinvurzel , Steinvurzel Law Group & Ross Robert Fulton , Rayburn, Cooper & Durham, P.A..

Jessica Brezinski, Counter Claimant, represented by Ronald E. Steinvurzel , Steinvurzel Law Group & Ross Robert Fulton , Rayburn, Cooper & Durham, P.A..

2 Hounds Design, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Albert Peter Allan , Allan IP Litigation.

USA Dog Shop, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Ronald E. Steinvurzel , Steinvurzel Law Group & Ross Robert Fulton , Rayburn, Cooper & Durham, P.A..

Jessica Brezinski, Counter Claimant, represented by Ronald E. Steinvurzel , Steinvurzel Law Group & Ross Robert Fulton , Rayburn, Cooper & Durham, P.A..

2 Hounds Design, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Albert Peter Allan , Allan IP Litigation.


ORDER

DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendants' "Motion To File Under Seal" (Document No. 75) filed August 25, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting Plaintiff's consent, the undersigned will grant the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases