CANNELLA v. BRENNAN

Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-1247.

PHILLIP CANNELLA, JOANN SMALL, and FIRST SENIOR FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC. Plaintiffs, v. KRISTA C. BRENNAN, HARRY McWILLIAMS, and GRANITE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

August 5, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PHILLIP CANNELLA, Plaintiff, represented by CRAIG E. ZIEGLER , MONTGOMERY, MC CRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, NEIL E. JOKELSON , NEIL E. JOKELSON & ASSOC, PC, SIDNEY S. LIEBESMAN , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS LLP, CHRISTA FRANK HIGH , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER RHOADS, K. CARRIE SARHANGI , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS, LLP & STEVEN PACHMAN , MONTGOMERY, MC CRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP..

JOANN SMALL, Plaintiff, represented by CRAIG E. ZIEGLER , MONTGOMERY, MC CRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, NEIL E. JOKELSON , NEIL E. JOKELSON & ASSOC, PC, SIDNEY S. LIEBESMAN , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS LLP, CHRISTA FRANK HIGH , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER RHOADS, K. CARRIE SARHANGI , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS, LLP & STEVEN PACHMAN , MONTGOMERY, MC CRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP..

FIRST SENIOR FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by CRAIG E. ZIEGLER , MONTGOMERY, MC CRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, NEIL E. JOKELSON , NEIL E. JOKELSON & ASSOC, PC, SIDNEY S. LIEBESMAN , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS LLP, CHRISTA FRANK HIGH , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER RHOADS, K. CARRIE SARHANGI , MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS, LLP & STEVEN PACHMAN , MONTGOMERY, MC CRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP..

KRISTA C. BRENNAN, Defendant, represented by JONATHAN Z. COHEN .

HARRY McWILLIAMS, Defendant, represented by SPEROS JOHN KOKONOS , KOKONOS & ECONOMIDES.

GRANITE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant, represented by SPEROS JOHN KOKONOS , KOKONOS & ECONOMIDES.

BRIAN POWELL, Movant, represented by STANLEY B. CHEIKEN , STANLEY B. CHEIKEN, ESQUIRE.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. CURTIS JOYNER, Judge.

Before the Court are Defendants Harry McWilliams and Granite Financial Solutions, LLC's ("Granite Financial")(collectively "Moving Defendants") Motion to Dismiss ("Motion")(Doc. No. 171) and Plaintiffs' Response in opposition thereto (Doc. No. 174). For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum, the Court grants in part and denies in part the Moving Defendants' motion.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases