1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DIXON v. HARDY
 

DIXON v. HARDY

No. 12 C 1714.

CLINTON DIXON, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS HARDY, Warden, Stateville Correction Center, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

July 28, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clinton Dixon, Petitioner, Pro Se.

Marcus Hardy, Respondent, represented by Stephen Matthew Soltanzadeh, Office of the Illinois Attorney General.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT W. GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

Petitioner Clinton Dixon has filed a pro se petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, the habeas petition is denied, and the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

BACKGROUND

Following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases