AVE MARIA SCHOOL OF LAW v. SEBELIUS

Case No. 2:13-cv-795-JSM-CM.

AVE MARIA SCHOOL OF LAW, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division.

July 30, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ave Maria School of Law, Plaintiff, represented by David Andrew Cortman , Alliance Defense Fund, Gregory S. Baylor , Alliance Defending Freedom, Jeremy D. Tedesco , Alliance Defending Freedom, Kevin Hayden Theriot , Alliance Defending Freedom, Matthew S. Bowman , Alliance Defending Freedom & Roger K. Gannam , Lindell & Farson, PA.

Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant, represented by Adam Grogg , U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

Thomas Perez, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Defendant, represented by Adam Grogg , U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant, represented by Adam Grogg , U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

United States Department of Labor, Defendant, represented by Adam Grogg , U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

United States Department of Treasury, Defendant, represented by Adam Grogg , U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

Jacob Lew, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, Defendant, represented by Adam Grogg , U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs.

American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, Amicus, represented by Brigitte Amiri , American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Daniel Mach , American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Daniel B. Tilley , ACLU Foundation of Florida, Inc. & Jennifer Lee , American Civil Liberties Union Foundation.


ORDER

JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Partially Unopposed Scheduling Motion (Dkt. 54). Upon review of the motion, and being otherwise advised in the premises, the motion is granted in part. Specifically, the Court adopts the briefing schedule set forth in option two of the motion. It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Plaintiff's Partially Unopposed Scheduling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases