VAN DUSEN v. CITY OF OAKLAND

Case No. 13-cv-05023-VC.

JAN VAN DUSEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 30, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan Van Dusen, Plaintiff, represented by Jan Elizabeth Van Dusen , Law Office of Jan Van Dusen.

City of Oakland, a municipal corporation, Defendant, represented by Charles Edward Vose , City Attorney's Office & Jennifer N. Logue , Oakland City Attorney's Office.

Sergeant Michael Valladon, individually and in his capacity as police officer for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Charles Edward Vose , City Attorney's Office & Jennifer N. Logue , Oakland City Attorney's Office.

My Nguyen, individually and in his capacity as police officer for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Charles Edward Vose , City Attorney's Office & Jennifer N. Logue , Oakland City Attorney's Office.

Megan Webb, individually and in her capacity as Director of Oakland Animal Services for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Charles Edward Vose , City Attorney's Office & Jennifer N. Logue , Oakland City Attorney's Office.

N. Lewis, individually and in her capacity as animal control officer for the City of Oakland, Defendant, Pro Se.

Jyothi Robertson, DVM, individually and in her capacities as veterinarian and veterinarian supervisor for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Stacey Dee Chau .

Jennifer Woolf, individually and in her capacity as veterinarian for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Stacey Dee Chau .

Rocio Fiero, individually and in her capacity as an attorney for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Charles Edward Vose , City Attorney's Office & Jennifer N. Logue , Oakland City Attorney's Office.

Randolph Hall, individually and in his capacity as an attorney for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Charles Edward Vose , City Attorney's Office & Jennifer N. Logue , Oakland City Attorney's Office.

Barbara Parker, individually and in her capacity as City Attorney for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Charles Edward Vose , City Attorney's Office & Jennifer N. Logue , Oakland City Attorney's Office.

East Bay SPCA, a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, Defendant, represented by Katherine S. Catlos , Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP & Robert Irving Lockwood , Kaufman Dolowich Voluck Gonzo LLP.

Ena Fisher, individually and in his/her capacity as an employee of East Bay SPCA, Defendant, represented by Katherine S. Catlos , Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP.

Joseph Romero, individually and in his capacity as an employee of East Bay SPCA, Defendant, represented by Katherine S. Catlos , Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP.

Laura Jamison, individually and in her capacity as an employee of East Bay SPCA, Defendant, represented by Katherine S. Catlos , Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP.

Island Cat Resources and Adoptions, a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, Defendant, represented by Stacey E. Stillman , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

Merry Bates, individually and as officer or director of Island Cat Resources and Adoptions, a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, Defendant, represented by Stacey E. Stillman , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

Fix our Ferals, a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, Defendant, represented by Edwin Forrest Shryock, Jr. , Vogl & Meredith LLP & Stacey E. Stillman , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

Dairne Ryan, individually and in her capacity as an officer or director of Fix Our Ferals, a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, Defendant, represented by Edwin Forrest Shryock, Jr. , Vogl & Meredith LLP & Stacey E. Stillman , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

Linda McCormick, individually and in her capacity as an officer or director and co-founder of Fix Our Ferals, a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, Defendant, represented by Edwin Forrest Shryock, Jr. , Vogl & Meredith LLP & Stacey E. Stillman , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

Ellen Lynch, individually and as a representative of Fix Our Ferals, a nonprofit corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of California, Defendant, represented by Edwin Forrest Shryock, Jr. , Vogl & Meredith LLP & Stacey E. Stillman , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

Brighthaven, Inc., a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, Defendant, represented by Stacey E. Stillman , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

Susan Hoffman, individually and as a representative of Brighthaven, Inc., a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, and a representative of Fix Our Ferals, a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Cali, Defendant, represented by Edwin Forrest Shryock, Jr. , Vogl & Meredith LLP & Stacey E. Stillman , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

Dacia Petersen, individually and as a representative of Brighthaven, Inc., a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California, and a representative of Fix Our Ferals, a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Cali, Defendant, represented by Edwin Forrest Shryock, Jr. , Vogl & Meredith LLP.

Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), a nonprofit corporation duly organized under the laws of the District of Columbia, Defendant, represented by Dale B. Goldfarb , Harrington Foxx Dubrow & Canter, LLP.

Amber Macaulay, individually and in her capacity as an attorney for the City of Oakland, Defendant, represented by Charles Edward Vose , City Attorney's Office & Jennifer N. Logue , Oakland City Attorney's Office.

James Pumphrey, Defendant, represented by Katherine S. Catlos , Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP.


ORDER

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

The plaintiff is ordered to serve all remaining defendants by September 2, 2014. The plaintiff is further ordered to file a brief of no more than 15 pages addressing the question whether all or part of her lawsuit should be dismissed under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). This brief is due September 15, 2014. Any defendant may file a response of no more than 15 pages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases