1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JTS CHOICE ENTERPRISES, INC. v. E.I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
 

JTS CHOICE ENTERPRISES, INC. v. E.I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03143-WJM-KMT.

JTS CHOICE ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

July 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JTS Choice Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Lauren Elizabeth Mosse Thompson , Theodore W. Rosen, P.C. & Theodore Wells Rosen , Theodore W. Rosen, P.C..

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Defendant, represented by David Matthew Stauss , Ballard Spahr, LLP, Katherine Allison White , Ballard Spahr, LLP, Roger P. Thomasch , Ballard Spahr, LLP & Stephen Joel Kastenberg , Ballard Spahr, LLP.

National Coatings & Supplies, Inc., Interested Party, represented by Mary Alice Wells , Wells, Anderson & Race, LLC.

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Counter Claimant, represented by David Matthew Stauss , Ballard Spahr, LLP, Katherine Allison White , Ballard Spahr, LLP, Roger P. Thomasch , Ballard Spahr, LLP & Stephen Joel Kastenberg , Ballard Spahr, LLP.

JTS Choice Enterprises, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Lauren Elizabeth Mosse Thompson , Theodore W. Rosen, P.C. & Theodore Wells Rosen , Theodore W. Rosen, P.C..

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Counter Claimant, represented by David Matthew Stauss , Ballard Spahr, LLP, Katherine Allison White , Ballard Spahr, LLP, Roger P. Thomasch , Ballard Spahr, LLP & Stephen Joel Kastenberg , Ballard Spahr, LLP.

JTS Choice Enterprises, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Lauren Elizabeth Mosse Thompson , Theodore W. Rosen, P.C. & Theodore Wells Rosen , Theodore W. Rosen, P.C..

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 59(e)

WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff JTS Choice Enterprises ("Plaintiff") brings this action against Defendant E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company ("Defendant" or "DuPont") alleging that Defendant engaged in anticompetitive actions that violated various federal and state laws. (Sec. Am. Compl. ("SAC") (ECF No. 100) pp. 17-28.) On February 26, 2014, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases