1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LORADOR v. VASQUEZ
 

LORADOR v. VASQUEZ

Case No. 8:14-cv-433-T-23AEP.

MARCO PAULO RODRIGUES LORADOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ADAM VASQUEZ, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.

July 16, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marco Paulo Rodrigues Lorador, Plaintiff, represented by Jeffrey P. Lieser , Lieser & Skaff, PL.

Paulo Renato Rodrigues Lorador, Plaintiff, represented by Jeffrey P. Lieser , Lieser & Skaff, PL.

Adam Vasquez, Defendant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Anton Makuhin, Defendant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Cirque Italia, LLC, Defendant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Peter J. Grilli, Mediator, represented by Peter John Grilli , Peter J. Grilli, PA & Peter John Grilli , Peter J. Grilli, PA.

Anton Makuhin, Counter Claimant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Cirque Italia, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Adam Vasquez, Counter Claimant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Marco Paulo Rodrigues Lorador, Counter Defendant, represented by Jeffrey P. Lieser , Lieser & Skaff, PL.

Paulo Renato Rodrigues Lorador, Counter Defendant, represented by Jeffrey P. Lieser , Lieser & Skaff, PL.

Anton Makuhin, Counter Claimant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Cirque Italia, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Adam Vasquez, Counter Claimant, represented by Robert P. Watrous , Robert P. Watrous, Chartered.

Marco Paulo Rodrigues Lorador, Counter Defendant, represented by Jeffrey P. Lieser , Lieser & Skaff, PL.

Paulo Renato Rodrigues Lorador, Counter Defendant, represented by Jeffrey P. Lieser , Lieser & Skaff, PL.

ORDER

STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves (Doc. 25) to strike "certain affirmative" defenses and to "treat other affirmative defenses as specific denials." Under Rule 12(f), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "[t]he court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter."

The plaintiffs argue that several defenses are insufficient because the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases