1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DRIVER v. D. MOSLEY TRUCKING, INC.
 

DRIVER v. D. MOSLEY TRUCKING, INC.

Case No. 4:13-CV-4074.

LOIS DRIVER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. D. MOSLEY TRUCKING, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division.

June 30, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lois Driver, Plaintiff, represented by John C. Riedel , Tatum, Tatum & Riedel & Samuel Roy Palermo , Thomas J. Henry, Injury Attorneys.

Robert Driver, Plaintiff, represented by John C. Riedel , Tatum, Tatum & Riedel & Samuel Roy Palermo , Thomas J. Henry, Injury Attorneys.

Keith Dedmon, Plaintiff, represented by Marcus Lane Vaden , Tatum, Tatum & Vaden & Tom Tatum , Tatum Tatum Riedel.

Sean Kearney, Plaintiff, represented by Marcus Lane Vaden , Tatum, Tatum & Vaden & Tom Tatum , Tatum Tatum Riedel.

D. Mosley Trucking, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jeffrey M. Martin , The Willis Law Group PLLC, Jeffrey W. Martin , The Willis Law Group, PLLC, Kirk D. Willis , The Willis Law Group, PLLC & Mark E. Giaquinta , Haller Colvin P.C..

Ramon R. Colon, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey M. Martin , The Willis Law Group PLLC, Jeffrey W. Martin , The Willis Law Group, PLLC, Kirk D. Willis , The Willis Law Group, PLLC & Mark E. Giaquinta , Haller Colvin P.C..

Steel Dynamics Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew L. Teel , Haller Colvin P.C., Bruce E. Munson , Munson, Rowlett, Moore & Boone, P.A., Holly A. Brady , Haller Colvin PC, Mark E. Giaquinta , Haller Colvin P.C. & William Cody Kees , Munson Rowlett Moore and Boone.

New Millennium Building Systems, Defendant, represented by Andrew L. Teel , Haller Colvin P.C., Bruce E. Munson , Munson, Rowlett, Moore & Boone, P.A., Holly A. Brady , Haller Colvin PC, Mark E. Giaquinta , Haller Colvin P.C. & William Cody Kees , Munson Rowlett Moore and Boone.

New Millennium Building Systems, L.L.C., Defendant, represented by Holly A. Brady , Haller Colvin PC, Mark E. Giaquinta , Haller Colvin P.C. & William Cody Kees , Munson Rowlett Moore and Boone.

ORDER

SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Strike Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 86). Plaintiffs have filed a response. (ECF No. 87). Defendants have filed a reply. (ECF No. 91).1 The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. On June 5, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 75). On June 11, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases