MARTIN THOMAS WIRTH, Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, in his official capacity as Governor of Colorado, JOHN SUTHERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Colorado, STEPHEN A. GROOME, in his official capacity as 11th District Court Judge, VICKI ARMSTRONG, in her official capacity as Public Trustee of Park County, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, LAWRENCE E. CASTLE, in his corporate and individual capacities, THE CASTLE LAW GROUP, LLC, MARY HAGER, individually, and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE), Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Colorado.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 23, 2014.
June 23, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Martin Thomas Wirth, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
John Hickenlooper, in his official capacity as Govenor of Colorado, Defendant, represented by Kathryn Anne Teresa Starnella , Colorado Attorney General's Office.
John Suthers, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Colorado, Defendant, represented by Kathryn Anne Teresa Starnella , Colorado Attorney General's Office.
Stephen A. Groome, in his official capacity as 11th District Court judge, Defendant, represented by Kathryn Anne Teresa Starnella , Colorado Attorney General's Office.
Vicki Armstrong, in her official capacity as Public Trustee of Park County, Defendant, represented by Herbert C. Phillips , Hayes, Phillips, Hoffmann & Carberry, PC-Fairplay.
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Defendant, represented by James P. Eckels , Bloom Murr Accomazzo & Siler, PC & Jamie Grant Siler , Bloom Murr Accomazzo & Siler, PC.
Lawrence E. Castle, in his Corporate Capacity, Defendant, represented by Christopher T. Groen , Castle Law Group, LLC, The & Phillip A. Vaglica , Castle Law Group, LLC, The.
Lawrence E. Castle (I), in his individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Christopher T. Groen , Castle Law Group, LLC, The & Phillip A. Vaglica , Castle Law Group, LLC, The.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's "Second Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint" (Doc. No. 56, filed April 2, 2014) and "Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Complaint" (Doc. No. 66, filed June 22, 2014).
Though Plaintiff has filed a motion to substitute his complaint, it appears he wishes to significantly amend his complaint. The court is unable to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
