1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PANDOL v. PANDOL BROS., INC.
 

PANDOL v. PANDOL BROS., INC.

Case No. 1:13-cv-01488-JLT.

JAMES A. PANDOL, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. PANDOL BROS., INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant.

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division.

June 16, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Pandol, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel S. Cho, McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte and Carruth LLP & D. Greg Durbin, McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte & Carruth LLP.

Pandol Bros. Inc., a California corporation, Defendant, represented by Paul William Reidl, Law Office Of Paul W. Reidl.

Pandol Bros. Inc., a California corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Paul William Reidl, Law Office Of Paul W. Reidl.

James A. Pandol, Counter Defendant, represented by Daniel S. Cho, McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte and Carruth LLP & D. Greg Durbin, McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte & Carruth LLP.

STIPULATED INJUNCTION (Doc. 29)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.

The Parties, James A. Pandol (hereinafter "PAMI") and Pandol Bros., Inc. (hereinafter "PBI") have stipulated to the entry of this injunction as part of a written settlement agreement. In accordance with Rule 65 (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby Orders as follows:

1. With respect to the continuing and future use of trademark(s) containing the term ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases