1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SILLE v. PARBALL CORPORATION
 

SILLE v. PARBALL CORPORATION

Case No. 2:07-CV-00901-KJD-VCF.

GRO ELISABET SILLE, Plaintiff, v. PARBALL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

June 6, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gro Elisabet Sille, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Crupain , Daniel Crupain, Kevin M. Hanratty , Hanratty Roberts Law Group, Stephen D. Chakwin, Jr. , Stephen D. Chakwin, Jr. & J. William Ebert , Lipson, Neilson, Cole, Seltzer & Garin, P.C..

Parball Corporation, Defendant, represented by J. William Ebert , Lipson, Neilson, Cole, Seltzer & Garin, P.C., Evangelin Lee Nichols , Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP & Jeffrey L O'Hara , Clyde & Co US LLP.

BridgeFunds, LLC, Defendant, represented by Mark Albright , Albright Stoddard Warnick & Albright.

American Legal Funding, LLC, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by George Edward Robinson , Pezzillo Lloyd & Elan S. Mizrahi , Jennings, Haug & Cunningham, LLP.

ALFund Prime LLC, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by George Edward Robinson , Pezzillo Lloyd & Elan S. Mizrahi , Jennings, Haug & Cunningham, LLP.

Kevin M. Hanratty, Consol Plaintiff, represented by Kevin M. Hanratty , Hanratty Roberts Law Group.

Lawsuit Financial Corporation, Creditor, represented by Brian David Nettles , Law Offices of Brian D. Nettles, Ltd..

Stephen Chakwin, Interested Party, represented by Andrew J Ungberg , Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz P.C., Don P Chairez , Law Office of Don Chairez, Khianna Bartholomew , Kimberly R. McGhee & Ronald C. Minkoff , Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz P.C..

Preferred Capital Lending of Nevada, LLC, Intervenor, represented by Sean K Claggett , Sean K. Claggett & Associates & William T Sykes , Sean K. Claggett & Associates.

ORDER

KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is intervenor creditor Lawsuit Financial Corporation's ("LF") Motion for Summary Judgment (#306). Plaintiff opposed (#308) and LF replied (#312). Also before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#307). LF opposed (#309) and Plaintiff replied (#310). Finally, Plaintiff's sur-responses (#313, #314) and LF's sur-reply (#315) are before the Court.

I. Background

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases