HARRIS v. IDEAL DISCOUNT MARKET

Civil Action No. 13-4914.

SETH HARRIS, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Labor v. IDEAL DISCOUNT MARKET, 250 S. Broad, Inc., d/b/a Ideal Discount Market, et al., Section "N" (4).

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

June 4, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

United States Department of Labor, Seth Harris, Acting Secretary of Labor, Plaintiff, represented by Karla Jackson Edwards , U. S. Department of Labor, James E. Culp , U. S. Department of Labor, M Patricia Smith , U. S. Department of Labor & Margaret Terry Cranford , U. S. Department of Labor.

Ideal Discount Market, individually and jointly, Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Scott , Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Michelle I. Anderson , Fisher & Phillips, LLP.

250 S. Broad, Inc, individually and jointly doing business as Ideal Discount Market, Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Scott , Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Michelle I. Anderson , Fisher & Phillips, LLP.

Kaki and Son LLC, individually and jointly doing business as Ideal Market 6, Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Scott , Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Michelle I. Anderson , Fisher & Phillips, LLP.

Kaki Inc, individually and jointly doing business as Ideal Discount Market 1, Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Scott , Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Michelle I. Anderson , Fisher & Phillips, LLP.

Morales Brothers, LLC, individually and jointly doing business as Ideal Market, Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Scott , Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Michelle I. Anderson , Fisher & Phillips, LLP.

Rampart Fuel LLC, individually and jointly doing business as Ideal Market, Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Scott , Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Michelle I. Anderson , Fisher & Phillips, LLP.

P.R Enterprises Inc, individually and jointly doing business as Ideal Discount Market 4, Defendant, represented by Timothy H. Scott , Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Michelle I. Anderson , Fisher & Phillips, LLP.


ORDER AND REASONS

KURT D. ENGELHARDT, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are two motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Monadel Elbarqa, Nofal Haifa, Gassan Kaki, Hamdallah Kaki, and Muwafak Kaki (hereinafter, the "Individual Defendants"), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Given the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Rec. Doc. 7), IT IS ORDERED that the Individual Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases