1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 138 F.Supp.3d
  5. 138 F.Supp.3d 303 (2014)
 

RADIANCY, INC. v. VIATEK CONSUMER PRODUCTS GROUP

No. 13-cv-3767 (NSR).

138 F.Supp.3d 303 (2014)

RADIANCY, INC., Plaintiff, v. VIATEK CONSUMER PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff, v. Radiancy, Inc., and PhotoMedex, Inc., Counterclaim-Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

As Amended April 1, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baldassare Vinti, Qian Jennifer Yang, Steven Michael Kayman, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff, Counterclaim-Defendants.

Daisy Manning, David A. Nester, Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr., Harness Dickey Law Firm, St. Louis, MO, Robert James Basil, The Basil Law Group, PC, New York, NY, Thomas M. Gautreaux, Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, Chattanooga, for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

OPINION AND ORDER

Radiancy ("Plaintiff") commenced this action against Viatek ("Defendant" and "Counterclaim Plaintiff") under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281 for patent infringement and pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) for false advertising, trade dress infringement, trademark infringement, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases