1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CLARK v. WARDEN
 

CLARK v. WARDEN

Civil Action No. RWT-13-3581.

ERIC CLARK, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

May 14, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric Clark, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Office of the Attorney General, Interested Party, represented by Rex Schultz Gordon , Maryland Office of the Attorney General.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge.

Pending is Defendants' Response to Show Cause, construed as a Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was advised that the Response would be construed as a Motion for Summary Judgment and of his right to file an Opposition in response. ECF No. 9. He has filed nothing further in this case. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief shall be denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases