FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. HARRY BROWN & CO., LLC

Civ. Action No. 2:13-cv-350-WHA(WO).

THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. HARRY BROWN & CO., LLC, et al., Defendants. HARRY BROWN & CO., LLC, et al., Counterclaimants, v. THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Counterclaim-Defendant.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division.

May 14, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by David Bruce Anderson , Anderson Weidner, LLC, Deanna Lee Weidner , Anderson Weidner, LLC & Marvis L. Jenkins , Anderson Weidner, LLC.

Harry Brown & Co., LLC, Defendant, represented by Christopher Boyce Hood , Heninger Garrison Davis LLC & Walter Lee Gresham, III , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC.

Stewardship Investments, LLC, Defendant, represented by Christopher Boyce Hood , Heninger Garrison Davis LLC & Walter Lee Gresham, III , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC.

Harry I. Brown, Jr., Defendant, represented by Christopher Boyce Hood , Heninger Garrison Davis LLC & Walter Lee Gresham, III , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC.

Estate of Harry Brown, Sr., Defendant, represented by Christopher Boyce Hood , Heninger Garrison Davis LLC.

Stewardship Investments, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Christopher Boyce Hood , Heninger Garrison Davis LLC & Walter Lee Gresham, III , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC.

Harry I. Brown, Jr., Counter Claimant, represented by Christopher Boyce Hood , Heninger Garrison Davis LLC & Walter Lee Gresham, III , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC.

Harry Brown & Co., LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Christopher Boyce Hood , Heninger Garrison Davis LLC & Walter Lee Gresham, III , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by David Bruce Anderson , Anderson Weidner, LLC, Deanna Lee Weidner , Anderson Weidner, LLC & Marvis L. Jenkins , Anderson Weidner, LLC.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.

This case is before the court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 33) and responses thereto.

The case has been complicated by several factors—a first amendment to the complaint, not complete unto itself, being filed in state court before removal; a second amendment to the complaint, not complete unto itself, filed in this court adopting all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases