PURCHASE PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CARVER FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, Defendant,
v.
MARINER'S BANK and PAUL SCHMIDT, SR., Third-Party Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 31, 2014.
March 31, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Purchase Partners, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Richard J. Abrahamsen, The Law Office of Richard J. Abrahamsen.
Carver Federal Savings Bank, Defendant, represented by Antonia M. Donohue, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Stanley Albert Camhi, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP & Christopher Edward Vatter, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP.
Mariner's Bank, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by Andrew Jan Pincus, Seidman & Pincus, LLC & Mitchell B. Seidman, Seidman & Associates, LLC.
Seidman & Pincus, LLC, Applicant, represented by Andrew Jan Pincus, Seidman & Pincus, LLC.
Carver Federal Savings Bank, Counter Claimant, represented by Antonia M. Donohue, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Christopher Edward Vatter, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Antonia M. Donohue, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Stanley Albert Camhi, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP & Christopher Edward Vatter, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP.
Mariner's Bank, Counter Defendant, represented by Andrew Jan Pincus, Seidman & Pincus, LLC & Mitchell B. Seidman, Seidman & Associates, LLC.
Purchase Partners, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Richard J. Abrahamsen, The Law Office of Richard J. Abrahamsen.
Carver Federal Savings Bank, Counter Claimant, represented by Antonia M. Donohue, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Stanley Albert Camhi, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP & Christopher Edward Vatter, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP.
Mariner's Bank, Counter Defendant, represented by Andrew Jan Pincus, Seidman & Pincus, LLC & Mitchell B. Seidman, Seidman & Associates, LLC.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge.
On February 5, 2014, the Court granted the motion of Seidman & Pincus, LLC ("S&P"), former counsel of record to Plaintiff Purchase Partners, LLC ("Purchase Partners"), seeking an order fixing a charging lien against Purchase Partners. (Docket No. 311). Purchase Partners now moves, pursuant to Rules 52(b), 59, and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for reconsideration...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
