1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROBERTSHAW v. PUDLES
 

ROBERTSHAW v. PUDLES

Civil Action No. 11-7353.

BARBARA ROBERTSHAW, v. GARY PUDLES, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

May 6, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

BARBARA ROBERTSHAW, Plaintiff, represented by F. EMMETT FITZPATRICK, III , FLAMM BOROFF & BACINE & WALTER H. FLAMM, JR. , FLAMM BOROFF & BACINE PC.

ANSWERNET, INC., Defendant, represented by MAURICE R. MITTS , MITTS LAW, LLC, GEOFFREY PAUL HULING , MITTS LAW LLC, JOHN E.D. LARKIN , GAWTHROP GREENWOOD PC & REBECCA FIELD EMERSON , MITTS LAW, LLC.

BETTY BABJAK, Defendant, represented by JOHN E.D. LARKIN , GAWTHROP GREENWOOD PC & STEPHEN G. RHOADS , GAWTHROP GREENWOOD, P.C..

GARY F. PUDLES, Defendant, Pro Se.

GARY F. PUDLES, Defendant, represented by JOHN E.D. LARKIN , GAWTHROP GREENWOOD PC & MAURICE R. MITTS , MITTS LAW, LLC.

WILLIAM ROBERTSHAW, Respondent, represented by SHANNON MARIE JENKINS , TREDWAY LUMSDAINE & DOYLE LLP & F. EMMETT FITZPATRICK, III , FLAMM BOROFF & BACINE.

GOLD GOCIAL GERSTEIN LLC, Respondent, represented by MARY J. PEDERSEN , POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN, CARRLE, ET AL..

CERIDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Movant, represented by RALPH G. WELLINGTON , SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL AND LEWIS L.L.P. & JULIE E. RANDOLPH , SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP.

GARY F. PUDLES, Counter Claimant, Pro Se.

GARY F. PUDLES, Counter Claimant, represented by JOHN E.D. LARKIN , GAWTHROP GREENWOOD PC.

BARBARA ROBERTSHAW, Counter Defendant, represented by F. EMMETT FITZPATRICK, III , FLAMM BOROFF & BACINE & WALTER H. FLAMM, JR. , FLAMM BOROFF & BACINE PC.

GARY F. PUDLES, Counter Claimant, represented by JOHN E.D. LARKIN , GAWTHROP GREENWOOD PC.

BARBARA ROBERTSHAW, Counter Defendant, represented by F. EMMETT FITZPATRICK, III , FLAMM BOROFF & BACINE & WALTER H. FLAMM, JR. , FLAMM BOROFF & BACINE PC.

ORDER

THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr., District Judge.

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2014, upon consideration of the motion of AnswerNet, Inc. and Gary Pudles pursuant to Rules 52(b) and 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt. No. 192), plaintiff Barbara Robertshaw's response (Dkt. No. 194), defendants' reply (Dkt. No. 195), oral argument on the motion, defendants' supplemental brief in support of their motion (Dkt. No. 209) and plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases