IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 3:10-MD-02143-RS-JCS, Case No. 3:13-cv-05372-RS.

IN RE: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION This document relates to: INGRAM MICRO INC. AND SYNNEX CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

May 6, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark S. Popofsky, ROPES & GRAY LLP, Washington, DC.

Jane E. Willis (pro hac vice), ROPES & GRAY LLP, Boston, MA.

Michelle L. Visser, ROPES & GRAY LLP, San Francisco, CA Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. & Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc.

Daniel A. Sasse, CROWELL & MORING LLP, Irvine, California, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ingram Micro Inc. and Synnex Corporation.

Evan Werbel, BAKER BOTTS LLP, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., Lite-On IT Corp. of Taiwan, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc.

Daniel M. Wall Brendan A. McShane, Belinda S. Lee, John Pellegrini LATHAM & WATKINS LLP,, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

Robert B. Pringle, Paul R. Griffin, Sean D. Meenan, WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant NEC Corporation

Lisa M. Kaas DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants BenQ Corporation and BenQ America Corp.

John F. Cove, Jr. BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP, Oakland, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Optiarc Inc., and Sony Optiarc America, Inc.

Mary Ellen Hennessy, Aharon S. Kaye, KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP, Chicago, IL.

Stuart M. Richter, KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for TEAC Corporation and TEAC America, Inc.

Nathan P. Eimer, EIMER STAHL LLP, Chicago, IL Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc.

Jeffrey L. Kessler WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENDING TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and Defendants, through the undersigned counsel, request that the Court enter the following order to continue the hearing date and briefing dates on Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss, extend Plaintiff's time to file a first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases