1473219 ONTARIO LIMITED, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v.
ALTERNATIVE AVIATION SERVICES, INC., and JOHN R. SHIRK, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, and
ALTERNATIVE AVIATION SERVICES, INC., and JOHN R. SHIRK, Counter-Third Party Plaintiffs/Third Party Counter-Defendants,
v.
DR. KIM CHUL, Third Party Defendant/Third Party Counter-Plaintiff.
United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 30, 2014.
April 30, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
1473219 ONTARIO LIMITED, Plaintiff, represented by Martin C. Weisman , Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C..
Alternative Aviation Services, Incorporated, Defendant, represented by David R. Draper , The Draper Law Firm & Michael F. Smith , The Smith Appellate Law Firm.
John R. SHIRK, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by David R. Draper , The Draper Law Firm.
Alternative Aviation Services, Incorporated, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by David R. Draper , The Draper Law Firm.
Dr. Chul Kim, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by Martin C. Weisman , Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C..
Dr. Chul Kim, Counter Claimant, represented by Martin C. Weisman , Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C..
1473219 ONTARIO LIMITED, Counter Claimant, represented by Martin C. Weisman , Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C..
Alternative Aviation Services, Incorporated, Counter Defendant, represented by David R. Draper , The Draper Law Firm.
John R. SHIRK, Counter Defendant, represented by David R. Draper , The Draper Law Firm.
Dr. Chul Kim, ThirdParty Plaintiff, represented by Martin C. Weisman , Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C..
Alternative Aviation Services, Incorporated, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by David R. Draper , The Draper Law Firm.
John R. SHIRK, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by David R. Draper , The Draper Law Firm.
United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISSOLVE STAY PENDING APPEAL
JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge.
Before the court is 1473219 Ontario Limited and Dr. Chul Kim's ("Plaintiffs) motion to dissolve stay pending appeal. The matter has been fully briefed and, pursuant to L.R. 7.1(f)(2), the court dispenses with oral argument.
Simplified, this matter involves a dispute regarding payment for aircraft repairs performed by Defendants and possession...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
