1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROSH v. INDEED, INC.
 

ROSH v. INDEED, INC.

Case No. 5:13-cv-03751-RMW.

ADAM ROSH, individually, on behalf of others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff, v. INDEED, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

May 1, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ADAM W. HANSEN , NICHOLS KASTER LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff ADAM ROSH.

MALCOLM A. HEINICKE , JESLYN A. MILLER , MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP, San Francisco, California.

KATHERINE M. FORSTER , MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendant INDEED, INC.

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ADJUST CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 6-2, and Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Adam Rosh ("Rosh") and Defendant Indeed, Inc. ("Indeed") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court vacate the case management conference in this matter. The parties have reached a settlement in principle, and anticipate filing a motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases