1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FORTE v. COUNTY OF MERCED
 

FORTE v. COUNTY OF MERCED

Case No. 1:11-cv-00318-AWI-BAM.

EUGENE E. FORTE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

April 30, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene E. Forte, Plaintiff, represented by Eugene E. Forte .

County of Merced, Defendant, represented by Roger S. Matzkind , Merced County Counsel & James Ethan Stone , Merced County Counsel.

John Picinich, Defendant, represented by Roger S. Matzkind , Merced County Counsel & James Ethan Stone , Merced County Counsel.

Mark Pazin, Defendant, represented by Roger S. Matzkind , Merced County Counsel & James Ethan Stone , Merced County Counsel.

Jaskowiac, Defendant, represented by Roger S. Matzkind , Merced County Counsel & James Ethan Stone , Merced County Counsel.

Hill, Defendant, represented by Roger S. Matzkind , Merced County Counsel & James Ethan Stone , Merced County Counsel.

Leuchner, Defendant, represented by Roger S. Matzkind , Merced County Counsel & James Ethan Stone , Merced County Counsel.

Jerry O'Banion, Defendant, represented by Roger S. Matzkind , Merced County Counsel & James Ethan Stone , Merced County Counsel.

City of Los Banos, Defendant, represented by James D. Emerson , Emerson, Corey, Sorensen, Church & Libke, Rayma Church , Emerson, Corey, Sorensen, Church & Libke & Ryan D. Libke , Emerson, Corey, Sorensen, Church & Libke.

Gary Brizzee, Defendant, represented by James D. Emerson , Emerson, Corey, Sorensen, Church & Libke.

Anthony Parker, Defendant, represented by James D. Emerson , Emerson, Corey, Sorensen, Church & Libke & Rayma Church , Emerson, Corey, Sorensen, Church & Libke.

James Fincher, Defendant, represented by Roger S. Matzkind , Merced County Counsel & James Ethan Stone , Merced County Counsel.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO AMEND OR SUPPLEMENT HIS COMPLAINT

BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Court held a scheduling conference on April 29, 2014. During the scheduling conference, Plaintiff expressed his desire to amend or supplement his complaint. Previously, on November 5, 2013, this Court issued a scheduling order which set a deadline of January 31, 2014 for plaintiff to file a motion to amend. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases