FERRING B.V. v. APOTEX, INC.

No. 3:13-cv-00595-RCJ-VPC.

FERRING B.V., Plaintiff, v. APOTEX, INC. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

April 21, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ferring B.V., Plaintiff, represented by James B Monroe , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP, Justin J. Bustos , Gordon Silver, Justin J Hasford , Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Paul W Browning , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP & Molly Malone Rezac , Gordon Silver.

Apotex, Inc., Defendant, represented by Barry P. Golob , Cozen O'Connor, Ian Scott , Cozen O'Connor, James W. Bradshaw , McDonald Carano Wilson, Kerry B McTigue , Cozen O'Connor LLP, Lisa M. Wiltshire Alstead , McDonald Carano Wilson LLP & William B. Coblentz , Cozen O'Connor.

Apotex Corp., Defendant, represented by Barry P. Golob , Cozen O'Connor, Ian Scott , Cozen O'Connor, James W. Bradshaw , McDonald Carano Wilson, Kerry B McTigue , Cozen O'Connor LLP, Lisa M. Wiltshire Alstead , McDonald Carano Wilson LLP & William B. Coblentz , Cozen O'Connor.

Apotex Corp., Counter Claimant, represented by Barry P. Golob , Cozen O'Connor, Ian Scott , Cozen O'Connor, James W. Bradshaw , McDonald Carano Wilson, Kerry B McTigue , Cozen O'Connor LLP, Lisa M. Wiltshire Alstead , McDonald Carano Wilson LLP & William B. Coblentz , Cozen O'Connor.

Apotex, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Barry P. Golob , Cozen O'Connor, Ian Scott , Cozen O'Connor, James W. Bradshaw , McDonald Carano Wilson, Kerry B McTigue , Cozen O'Connor LLP, Lisa M. Wiltshire Alstead , McDonald Carano Wilson LLP & William B. Coblentz , Cozen O'Connor.

Ferring B.V., Counter Defendant, represented by James B Monroe , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP, Justin J. Bustos , Gordon Silver, Justin J Hasford , Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Paul W Browning , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP & Molly Malone Rezac , Gordon Silver.


ORDER

ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.

Ferring recently moved for a temporary restraining order because although Apotex had amended its ANDA No. 202286 to avoid infringement of Ferring's `739, `106, and `795 Patents, the ANDA as amended still permitted Apotex to infringe Ferring's `005 Patent. Apotex responded by showing that it had further amended the ANDA to bring its parameters outside the scope of the `005 Patent, as well. The Court therefore ruled that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases