1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. UMAR v. STORLIE
 

UMAR v. STORLIE

No. C12-06071 HRL.

AMMIR UMAR, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG STORLIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN OFFICER OF THE SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

April 14, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ammir Umar, Plaintiff, represented by Jaime Alejandro Leanos .

Craig Storlie, Defendant, represented by Shannon Smyth-Mendoza , Office of the City Attorney & Nora Valerie Frimann , Office of the City Attorney.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Re: Docket No. 33]

HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.

Ammir Umar sues Officer Craig Storlie based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, as well as related state law claims for false imprisonment and negligent infliction of emotion distress. See Complaint, Dkt. 1. Defendant moves for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases