HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
PAUL MALTSEFF, Defendant.
United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 10, 2014.
April 10, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Honeywell International Inc, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Isaac B Hall, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Kerry L Bundy, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Louis David Peterson, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON, Martin S. Chester, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Michael J Ewart, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON, Randall E Kahnke, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Ryan Long, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP & Tyler Young, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP.
Intermec, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Isaac B Hall, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Kerry L Bundy, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Martin S. Chester, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Randall E Kahnke, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Ryan Long, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Tyler Young, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Michael J Ewart, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON & Louis David Peterson, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON.
Intermec Technologies Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Isaac B Hall, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Kerry L Bundy, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Martin S. Chester, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Randall E Kahnke, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Ryan Long, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Tyler Young, FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, Michael J Ewart, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON & Louis David Peterson, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON.
Paul Maltseff, an Individual, Defendant, represented by Paul R Raskin, CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER & PREECE & William F Cronin, CORR CRONIN MICHELSON BAUMGARDNER & PREECE.
United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Mot. (Dkt. # 40).) Having considered the submissions of the parties, the balance of the record, the relevant law, and having heard oral argument, the court DENIES Defendant's motion. The court, however, court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
