1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DUCKHORN WINE COMPANY v. SUTTER HOME WINERY, INC.
 

DUCKHORN WINE COMPANY v. SUTTER HOME WINERY, INC.

No. C 13-05525 RS.

DUCKHORN WINE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SUTTER HOME WINERY, INC., d/b/a Trinchero Family Estates, DUCK COMMANDER, INC., and WAL-MART STORES INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

April 10, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duckhorn Wine Company, Plaintiff, represented by Henry C. Bunsow , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP, Brian A. E. Smith , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP, Denise M. De Mory , Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP, Jeffrey Daniel Chen , Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP & Robin King Curtis , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP.

Sutter Home Winery, Inc., Defendant, represented by J. Scott Gerien , Dickenson Peatman & Fogarty.

Duck Commander, Inc., Defendant, represented by J. Scott Gerien , Dickenson Peatman & Fogarty.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant, represented by J. Scott Gerien , Dickenson Peatman & Fogarty.

Duck Commander, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by J. Scott Gerien , Dickenson Peatman & Fogarty.

Sutter Home Winery, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by J. Scott Gerien , Dickenson Peatman & Fogarty.

Duckhorn Wine Company, Counter-defendant, represented by Henry C. Bunsow , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP, Brian A. E. Smith , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP, Denise M. De Mory , Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP, Jeffrey Daniel Chen , Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP & Robin King Curtis , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by J. Scott Gerien , Dickenson Peatman & Fogarty.

Duckhorn Wine Company, Counter-defendant, represented by Henry C. Bunsow , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP, Brian A. E. Smith , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP, Denise M. De Mory , Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP, Jeffrey Daniel Chen , Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP & Robin King Curtis , Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP.

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case Management Conference on April 10, 2014. After considering the Joint Case Management Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases