GROSS v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY LAS VEGAS

Case No. 2:11-cv-01602-JCM-CWH.

IRIS JANE GROSS, Plaintiff, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY LAS VEGAS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

April 8, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Iris Jane Gross, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Housing Authority of the City of Las Vegas, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Father Dave Casaleggio, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Carl O. Rowe, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Zelda Ellis, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Shandra Hudson, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Norma Gray, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Al Conklin, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Maria Luevanos, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Maria Machuca, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.

Essie Williams, Defendant, represented by Amber L White-Davidson , Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. & Theodore Parker III , Parker, Nelson & Associates.


ORDER

C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

The parties submitted a Stipulated Protective Order (#55),which the Court reviewed and entered. This order modifies the parties' stipulated protective order with respect to the sealing of documents. The protective order was approved to facilitate the parties' discovery exchanges. However, the parties have not made an individualized showing that a protective order is necessary to protect their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases