U.S. v. TOWN OF COLORADO CITY

No. 3:12-cv-8123-HRH.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF COLORADO CITY, ARIZONA; et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

March 31, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

United States of America, Plaintiff, represented by Anika Gzifa , US Dept of Justice - Civil Rights, Eric Treene , US Dept of Justice - Civil Rights, Jessica Clarke Crockett , US Dept of Justice - Civil Rights, Lori K Wagner , US Dept of Justice - Civil Rights Division, Matthew J Donnelly , US Dept of Justice, Rachael Tamar Hagler , US Dept of Justice - Civil Rights & Sean Richard Keveney , US Dept of Justice.

Town of Colorado City, Arizona, Defendant, represented by Asha Sebastian , Graif Barrett & Matura PC, Jeffrey Charles Matura , Graif Barrett & Matura PC & Kathleen Josephine Abke , Stirba PC.

City of Hildale, Utah, Defendant, represented by J Michael Hansen , Stirba PC, Kathleen Josephine Abke , Stirba PC, Peter Stirba , Stirba PC & R Blake Hamilton , Stirba PC.

Twin City Power, Defendant, represented by J Michael Hansen , Stirba PC, Kathleen Josephine Abke , Stirba PC, Peter Stirba , Stirba PC & R Blake Hamilton , Stirba PC.

Twin City Water Authority Incorporated, Defendant, represented by J Michael Hansen , Stirba PC, Kathleen Josephine Abke , Stirba PC, Peter Stirba , Stirba PC & R Blake Hamilton , Stirba PC.

Ronald Cooke, Movant, represented by William G Walker , William G Walker PC.

Jinjer Cooke, Movant, represented by William G Walker , William G Walker PC.

Seth Cooke, Movant, represented by William G Walker , William G Walker PC.

Nephi Jeffs, Movant, represented by Michael L Piccarreta , Piccarreta & Davis PC.

Isaac Jeffs, Movant, represented by Michael L Piccarreta , Piccarreta & Davis PC.


ORDER

H. RUSSEL HOLLAND, District Judge.

Plaintiff's Rule 36(a)(6) Motion1

Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 36(a)(6) for an order declaring certain matters admitted or, in the alternative, compelling defendant Town of Colorado City ("Colorado City") to respond more fully to plaintiff's first and third requests for admissions. The motion is opposed.2 Oral argument has not been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases