COMPUTERIZED SCREENING, INC. v. STAYHEALTHY, INC.

Case No. 3:13-cv-00389-RCJ-WGC.

COMPUTERIZED SCREENING, INC., Plaintiff, v. STAYHEALTHY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

March 11, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

RICHARD G. CAMPBELL, JR. , ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP, Reno, Nevada, JENNIFER E. HOEKEL , ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, St. Louis, Missouri, Attorneys for Plaintiff Computerized Screening, Inc.

JEREMY J. NORK , HOLLAND & HART LLP, Reno, Nevada, Dawn M. Coulson , Pro Hac Vice Michael B. Wilson , Pro Hac Vice Epps & Coulson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Bijal V. Vakil , Pro Hac Vice Wendi R. Schepler , Pro Hac Vice White & Case LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Stayhealthy, Inc.


STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiff COMPUTERIZED SCREENING, INC., through its counsel of record, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, and Defendant STAYHEALTHY, INC., through its counsel of record, Holland & Hart LLP and Epps & Coulson LLP, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action and all claims asserted herein with prejudice. Each party to bear its own...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases