1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 3 F.Supp.3d
  5. 3 F.Supp.3d 917 (2014)
 

JORDAN v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORP.

Case No. 12-2573.

3 F.Supp.3d 917 (2014)

Jack R. JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

Order Denying Motion to Amend June 27, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack R. Jordan, Parkville, MO, pro se.

Christopher J. Leopold, Mark D. Hinderks, Kansas City, MO, Eugene Scalia, Jason J. Mendro, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ERIC F. MELGREN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Jack R. Jordan brings a retaliation claim under § 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX") (18 U.S.C. § 1514A) against Defendant Sprint Nextel Corporation, Inc. and Defendant Gary Foresee. He claims that Defendants constructively discharged him and retaliated against him in several other ways. Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases