1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 993 F.Supp.2d
  5. 993 F.Supp.2d 100 (2014)
 

AMPHENOL CORP. v. PAUL

Civil No. 3:12cv00543(AVC).

993 F.Supp.2d 100 (2014)

AMPHENOL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Richard PAUL and TE Connectivity, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 24, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony L. Gallia, James Beausoleil, James J. Halligan, Duane Morris, Philadelphia, PA, James F. Walsh, Miller, Garrell & Walsh, LLC, Michael C. Jankovsky, Quatrella & Rizio, Fairfield, CT, for Plaintiff.

Ian T. Clarke-Fisher, Robinson & Cole, LLP, Nuala E. Droney, Stephen W. Aronson, Robinson & Cole, LLP, Hartford, CT, John B. Flood, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Washington, DC, John Gerard Stretton, Joshua J. Sarner, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Stamford, CT, for Defendant.

RULING ON THE DEFENDANT, PAUL'S, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALFRED V. COVELLO, District Judge.

This is an action for damages and equitable relief in which the plaintiff, Amphenol Corporation (hereinafter "Amphenol"), claims that the defendant, Richard Paul, breached a non-competition agreement. It is brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030 et seq., along with tenets concerning breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases