1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PITMAN v. OTTEHBERG
 

PITMAN v. OTTEHBERG

Civil No. 10-2538 (NLH/KMW).

PERMAN PITMAN, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA M. OTTEHBERG, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

December 31, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Melletz, Esquire, Ross Begelman, Esquire, Begelman, Orlow & Melletz, Cherry Hill, NJ, Attorneys for Plaintiff Perman Pitman.

Matthew J. Behr, Esquire, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Cherry Hill, NJ, Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Woshnak.

Elyse Glazer Crawford, Esquire Shimberg & Friel PC, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, Attorney for Defendant Harry Collins.

Stuart W. Jay, Esquire Taylor and Jay, LLC, Woodbury, NJ, Attorneys for Defendants Isidoro Reyes and Gilberto Morales.

OPINION

NOEL L. HILLMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court by way of a motion [Doc. No. 85] for summary judgment by Defendants Gilberto Morales and Isidoro Reyes pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Court has considered the parties' submissions and decides this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78.

For the reasons expressed below, Defendants' motion will be granted.

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases