1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 984 F.Supp.2d
  5. 984 F.Supp.2d 771 (2013)
 

BLOOMFIELD v. WHIRLPOOL CORP.

Case No. 3:12-cv-00870.

984 F.Supp.2d 771 (2013)

Brenda BLOOMFIELD, Plaintiff v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.

Opinion Denying Reconsideration February 7, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danny L. Caudill, Beggs Caudill, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff.

Adam C. Wit, Raven A. Winters, Littler Mendelson, Chicago, IL, Kent D. Riesen, Anspach Meeks Ellenberger, Toledo, OH, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JEFFREY J. HELMICK, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before me are the cross-motions of Defendant Whirlpool Corp., for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 23), and Plaintiff Brenda Bloomfield, (Doc. No. 27), for partial summary judgment. Both parties have filed briefs in opposition and in reply. For the following reasons, Whirlpool's motion is granted in part and denied in part and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases