SHOEMAKER v. CITY OF HOWELL

Case No. 11-15135.

982 F.Supp.2d 745 (2013)

David SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HOWELL, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

November 12, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth A. Downey, Elizabeth A. Downey, P.C., Farmington Hills, MI, for Plaintiff.

Anne McClorey McLaughlin, Johnson, Rosati, Schultz & Joppich, P.C., Marcelyn A. Stepanski, Margaret T. Debler, Johnson, Rosati, Farmington Hills, MI, for Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the parties' cross Motions for Summary Judgment [dkts. 25, 26]. The Motions have been fully briefed. For the following reasons, Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED and Defendant's Motion is DENIED.

II. BACKGROUND

The City of Howell, Michigan ("the City") enacted a version of City Ordinance § 622.02 ("the Ordinance")...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases