1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 958 F.Supp.2d
  5. 958 F.Supp.2d 827 (2013)
 

RATLEDGE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RY. CO.

No. 1:12-CV-402.

958 F.Supp.2d 827 (2013)

George RATLEDGE, Plaintiff, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. and Bull Moose Tube Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga.

July 25, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. Colvin, William G. Colvin PLLC, Chattanooga, TN, William C. Tucker, Jr., Petway, Tucker & Barganier, L.L.C., Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff.

Alison B. Martin, Kevin D. Hudson, Larry L. Cash, Michael James Dumitru, Miller & Martin, PLLC, Chattanooga, TN, Jeffrey S. Berlin, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, Angela H. Smith, William R. Johnson, Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP, Marietta, GA, Charles E. Pierce, Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele, LLP, Knoxville, TN, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM

CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Bull Moose Tube Company's ("Bull Moose") motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Court File No. 22). Plaintiff George Ratledge ("Plaintiff") responded to Bull Moose's motion (Court File No. 34), and Bull Moose replied to Plaintiff's response (Court File No. 38). Bull Moose argues the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over it because, although it maintains contacts with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases