1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CARTER v. ARCHDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
 

CARTER v. ARCHDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT

No. 1:13cv613.

JAMES J. CARTER, Plaintiff, v. ARCHDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID JONES, CITY OF ARCHDALE, GARLAND YATES, and RANDOLPH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.

September 10, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JAMES J. CARTER, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

ARCHDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant, represented by PATRICK HOUGHTON FLANAGAN, CRANFILL SUMNER AND HARTZOG, L.L.P..

DAVID JONES, Defendant, represented by PATRICK HOUGHTON FLANAGAN, CRANFILL SUMNER AND HARTZOG, L.L.P..

CITY OF ARCHDALE, Defendant, represented by PATRICK HOUGHTON FLANAGAN, CRANFILL SUMNER AND HARTZOG, L.L.P..

GARLAND YATES, Defendant, represented by DAVID J. ADINOLFI, II, N. C. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

RANDOLPH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Defendant, represented by DAVID J. ADINOLFI, II, N. C. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

ORDER

THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on August 22, 2013, was served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636.

The court has reviewed and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases