1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CROFT v. PROTOMOTIVE, INC.
 

CROFT v. PROTOMOTIVE, INC.

Case No. 3:12-CV-03102.

DONNA CROFT; BOBBIE HICKMAN; and BENJAMIN SUTTON, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. PROTOMOTIVE, INC.; PROTOMOTIVE, LLC; TODD KNIGHTON and CYNTHIA KNIGHTON, Individually and as Owners/Managers of Protomotive, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division.

September 10, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donna Croft, Plaintiff, represented by John Holleman , Holleman & Associate P.A., Maryna O. Jackson , Holleman Associates, Paul G. Pfeifer , Pfeifer Law Firm, P.A. & Timothy A. Steadman , Holleman & Associates, P.A..

Bobbie Hickman, Plaintiff, represented by John Holleman , Holleman & Associate P.A., Maryna O. Jackson , Holleman Associates, Paul G. Pfeifer , Pfeifer Law Firm, P.A. & Timothy A. Steadman , Holleman & Associates, P.A..

Benjamin Sutton, Plaintiff, represented by John Holleman , Holleman & Associate P.A., Maryna O. Jackson , Holleman Associates, Paul G. Pfeifer , Pfeifer Law Firm, P.A. & Timothy A. Steadman , Holleman & Associates, P.A..

Protomotive, Inc, Defendant, represented by Allen C. Dobson , Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon & Galchus, P.C. & Gregory James Northen , Cross Gunter Witherspoon Galchus P.C..

Protomotive, LLC, Defendant, represented by Allen C. Dobson , Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon & Galchus, P.C. & Gregory James Northen , Cross Gunter Witherspoon Galchus P.C..

Todd Knighton, Defendant, represented by Allen C. Dobson , Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon & Galchus, P.C. & Gregory James Northen , Cross Gunter Witherspoon Galchus P.C..

Cynthia Knighton, Defendant, represented by Allen C. Dobson , Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon & Galchus, P.C. & Gregory James Northen , Cross Gunter Witherspoon Galchus P.C..

ORDER

P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.

On May 13, 2013, the Court conditionally certified this action a collective action under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and authorized the issuance of notice and a consent to join form to potential class members (Doc. 38). Before the Court is Defendants' motion to decertify collective action (Doc. 44). Plaintiffs have filed a response (Doc. 46) stating that they do not oppose Defendants' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases