A.A., et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
JONATHAN RAYMOND, in his personal and official capacity as Superintendent of the Sacramento City Unified School District, Defendant.
United States District Court, E.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 5, 2013.
September 5, 2013.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
A. A., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
D. A., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
E. C., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
G. C., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
V. M., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
Chao Chang, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
J. G., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
J. M., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
Ang. R.B., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
Ant. R.B., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
D. S., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
C. S., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
Parent Teacher Association of Joseph Bonnheim Elementary School, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
Parent Teacher Association of Clayton B. Wire Elementary School, laintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
Parent Teacher Organization of Maple Elementary School, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Law Office of Mark E. Merin.
Jonathan Raymond, Defendant, represented by Gregory A. Wedner, Lozano Smith & Sloan Robert Simmons, Lozano Smith.
United States District Court, E.D. California.
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant's motion to dismiss four of plaintiffs' five claims challenging defendant's closure of elementary schools. (ECF 38.) The court decided this motion without a hearing. For the reasons below, the court GRANTS defendant's motion.
I. ALLEGED FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case arises from the decision on February 21, 2013, of the Sacramento City...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
