1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KELLY v. RUBY TUESDAY RESTAURANT
 

KELLY v. RUBY TUESDAY RESTAURANT

Civil Action No. 12-2034.

KELLY et al., Plaintiffs, v. RUBY TUESDAY RESTAURANT et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 3, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

TIM KELLY, Plaintiff, represented by BRIDGET SARO, LAW OFFICES OF FRANK J. ZAZZARO.

SIGRID KELLY, Plaintiff, represented by BRIDGET SARO, LAW OFFICES OF FRANK J. ZAZZARO.

RUBY TUESDAY RESTAURANT, Defendant, represented by DANIEL M. YOUNG, WARD GREENBERG HELLER & REIDY LLP.

OPINION

STANLEY R. CHESLER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon the motions by Defendant Ruby Tuesday, Inc. for partial summary judgment1 (Docket Entry 18) and to exclude evidence offered by Plaintiffs' expert, Michael G. Natoli (Docket Entry 19). Plaintiffs Tim and Sigrid Kelly have opposed the motions. (Docket Entries 22 & 23). The Court has considered the parties' submissions and opts to rule without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases