1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY v. SEBELIUS
 

EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY v. SEBELIUS

Civil Action No. H-12-3009.

EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

August 30, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

East Texas Baptist University, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Christopher Rassbach , The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Diana Marie Verm , Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Eric Shawn Baxter , The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, James E Zucker , Yetter Coleman LLP & Scott A. Keller , Yetter Coleman LLP.

Houston Baptist University, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Christopher Rassbach , The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Diana Marie Verm , Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Eric Shawn Baxter , The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, James E Zucker , Yetter Coleman LLP & Scott A. Keller , Yetter Coleman LLP.

Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Defendant, represented by Jacek Pruski , U.S. Department of Justice & Daniel David Hu , Office of the US Attorneys Office.

Secretary Hilda L. Solis, Defendant, represented by Jacek Pruski , U.S. Department of Justice & Daniel David Hu , Office of the US Attorneys Office.

Secretary Timothy Geithner, Defendant, represented by Jacek Pruski , U.S. Department of Justice & Daniel David Hu , Office of the US Attorneys Office.

Department Of Health And Human Services, Defendant, represented by Jacek Pruski , U.S. Department of Justice & Daniel David Hu , Office of the US Attorneys Office.

Department Of Labor, Defendant, represented by Jacek Pruski , U.S. Department of Justice & Daniel David Hu , Office of the US Attorneys Office.

Department of Treasury, Defendant, represented by Jacek Pruski , U.S. Department of Justice & Daniel David Hu , Office of the US Attorneys Office.

Westminster Theological Seminary, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Kenneth R Wynne , Wynne & Wynne LLP.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

This suit, one of many filed around the country, challenges certain implementing regulations of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The plaintiffs are nonprofit religious educational institutions alleging that the regulations are unconstitutional because they require the institutions to provide health insurance coverage for abortifacient drugs, related education, and counseling.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases