GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. APPLE, INC.

Case No. CV-12-04882-PSG.

GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

August 29, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

RODERICK G. DORMAN (SBN 96908), LAWRENCE M. HADLEY (SBN 1577228), MIEKE K. MALMBERG (SBN 209992), JEFFREY HUANG (SBN 266774), MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C., Los Angeles. California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

TIMOTHY S. TETER, LOWELL D. MEAD, COOLEYLLP, Palo Alto, CA, Attorneys for Defendant APPLE, INC.


JOINT STIPULATION BASED ON NEED TO EXTEND ALL CASE DEADLINES BY APPROXIMATELY 60 DAYS

PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. and defendant Apple Inc. jointly stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to extend all deadlines in the current case schedule by approximately 60 days. The current schedule, as ordered by the Court, is set forth in the Order Granting (As Modified) Supplemental Joint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases