UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
WALTER LIEW and CHRISTINA LIEW, Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 26, 2013.
August 26, 2013.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Walter Liew, Defendant, represented by Stuart L. Gasner, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Doron Weinberg, Law Offices of Doron Weinberg, John Lyle Williams, Jr., Manchester, Williams & Seibert, Katherine Morag Lovett, Keker & Van Nest LLP & Simona Alessandra Agnolucci, Keker & Van Nest LLP.
Christina Liew, Defendant, represented by Doron Weinberg, Law Offices of Doron Weinberg & Ismail Jomo Ramsey, Ramsey & Ehrlich LLP.
Robert J. Maegerle, Defendant, represented by Jerome J. Froelich, Jr, McKenney & Froelich.
USA Performance Technology, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stuart L. Gasner, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Katherine Morag Lovett, Keker & Van Nest LLP & Simona Alessandra Agnolucci, Keker & Van Nest LLP.
Tze Chao, Defendant, represented by Edmund Daniel Lyons, Lyons Law Firm.
Pangang Group Company, Ltd., Defendant, represented by John Mark Potter, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP & Robert P. Feldman, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.
Pangang Group Steel Vanadium & Titanium Company, Ltd., Defendant, represented by John Mark Potter, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP & Robert P. Feldman, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.
Pangang Group Titanium Industry Company, Ltd., Defendant, represented by John Mark Potter, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP & Robert P. Feldman, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.
Pangang Group International Economic & Trading Company, Defendant, represented by John Mark Potter, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP & Robert P. Feldman, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.
USA, Plaintiff, represented by John Henry Hemann, United States Attorney's Office & Peter Benjamin Axelrod, United States Attorney's Office.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS Docket Nos. 345, 366, 409)
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Motion to Suppress Evidence filed by Walter Liew ("Mr. Liew") and Christina Liew ("Mrs. Liew") (collectively, "the Liews"). The Court has considered the parties' papers, relevant legal authority, the record in this case, and it has had the benefit or oral argument.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
