1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 966 F.Supp.2d
  5. 966 F.Supp.2d 374 (2013)
 

GE DANDONG v. PINNACLE PERFORMANCE LTD.

No. 10 Civ. 8086(JMF).

966 F.Supp.2d 374 (2013)

GE DANDONG et al., Plaintiffs, v. PINNACLE PERFORMANCE LTD. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 22, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Martin McNeela, Daniel Hume, Christopher Scott Studebaker, Edward Michael Varga, Ira M. Press, Meghan Joan Summers, Kirby McInerney LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Bruce Domenick Angiolillo, Andrew David Waggaman Cattell, Hiral D. Mehta, Jonathan K. Youngwood, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge:

In this putative class action, a group of Singapore investors ("Plaintiffs") assert various claims against Morgan Stanley & Co. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, "Defendants"), related to a series of credit-linked notes (the "Pinnacle Notes" or the "Notes") issued by Defendant Pinnacle Performance Limited ("Pinnacle") and purchased by Plaintiffs. On October 31, 2011, the Honorable Leonard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases