WILLIAMS v. FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES

Case No. 2:13-CV-37 TS.

STEVEN R. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, a Delaware corporation; MICHAEL BAUTCH, an individual; KEVIN WILCZYNSKI, an individual; DAVID TREASE, an individual; AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation; ROCKY MOUNTAIN CARE CLINIC, INC., an expired Utah corporation; JOHN A. GARCIA and CHRISTINA A. BACK individually and doing business as ROCKY MOUNTAIN CARE CLINIC, INC.; and ESCREEN, INC, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.

August 21, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven R. Williams, Plaintiff, represented by D. Scott Crook , ARNOLD & CROOK PLLC.

Fedex Corporate Services, Defendant, represented by Colby S. Morgan, Jr. , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Elizabeth Low , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION & Heidi G. Goebel , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.

Michael Bautch, Defendant, represented by Elizabeth Low , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION.

Kevin Wilczynski, Defendant, represented by Elizabeth Low , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION & Heidi G. Goebel , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.

David Trease, Defendant, represented by Elizabeth Low , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION & Heidi G. Goebel , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.

Rocky Mountain Care Clinic, Defendant, represented by Michael S. Wilde , BLACKBURN & STOLL LC.

John A. Garcia, Defendant, represented by Michael S. Wilde , BLACKBURN & STOLL LC.

Escreen, Defendant, represented by Kristin A. VanOrman , STRONG & HANNI & Jeremy G. Knight , STRONG & HANNI.

Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Colby S. Morgan, Jr. , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Elizabeth Low , FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION & Heidi G. Goebel , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT MICHAEL BAUTCH'S MOTION TO DISMISS

TED STEWART, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Michael Bautch's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the Motion in part and deny it in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The following facts are relevant to Defendant's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases