PATHAK v. AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC

No. C 13-1823 JSW.

GAURAV PATHAK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

August 9, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gaurav Pathak, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm & Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP.

Salah Dajani, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm & Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP.

Zane Husseini, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm & Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP.

Naveed Jalal, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm & Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP.

Dolan Lonergan, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm & Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP.

William McRae, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm & Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP.

Xaimuangmonh, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm & Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP.

Lord El-Salaam, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm & Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP.

Avis Rent A Car System, LLC,, Defendant, represented by Kai-Ching Cha , Littler Mendelson & Patrick H. Hicks , Littler Mendelson.

AB Car Rental Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Kai-Ching Cha , Littler Mendelson & Patrick H. Hicks , Littler Mendelson.

Budget Rent A Car System, Inc., Defendant, represented by Kai-Ching Cha , Littler Mendelson & Patrick H. Hicks , Littler Mendelson.

Marie Peraita, Defendant, represented by Bryan J. McCormack , McCormack Law Firm, Jason Marx Erlich , McCormack & Erlich, LLP, Kai-Ching Cha , Littler Mendelson & Patrick H. Hicks , Littler Mendelson.

Avis Budget Group, Inc., Defendant, represented by Kai-Ching Cha , Littler Mendelson.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to remand based on the grounds that federal law does not preempt Plaintiffs' claims. The Court finds the motion fully briefed, ripe for decision, and suitable for resolution without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the hearing set for August 23, 2013. Having considered the parties' papers and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases