1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S. v. SCARFO
 

U.S. v. SCARFO

Crim. No. 11-740 (RBK).

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICODEMO S. SCARFO, et al.,

United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Camden Vicinage.

August 2, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

NICODEMO S. SCARFO, Defendant, represented by MICHAEL E. RILEY , LAW OFFICES OF RILEY & RILEY & JEREMY C. GELB , COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC-NJ BAR.

SALVATORE PELULLO, Defendant, represented by TROY A. ARCHIE , J. MICHAEL FARRELL & MICHAEL J. FARRELL .

WILLIAM MAXWELL, Defendant, represented by MICHAEL N. HUFF .

JOHN MAXWELL, Defendant, represented by MARK W. CATANZARO .

WILLIAM HANDLEY, Defendant, represented by PAUL A. SARMOUSAKIS .

CORY LESHNER, Defendant, represented by ROCCO C. CIPPARONE, JR. , LAW OFFICE OF ROCCO C. CIPPARONE, JR..

JOHN PARISI, Defendant, represented by LISA EVANS LEWIS , OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER.

DAVID ADLER, Defendant, represented by BARRY I. GROSS , DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP, GREGORY P. MILLER , COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC-NJ BAR, STEPHEN G. STROUP , DRINKER BIDDLE & REALTH LLP & TRACY SCHLOSS , COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC-NJ BAR.

HOWARD DROSSNER, Defendant, represented by CREED C. BLACK , COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC-NJBAR, CHRISTOPHER D. ADAMS , WALDER, HAYDEN & BROGAN, PA, JOSEPH A. HAYDEN, JR. , WALDER, HAYDEN & BROGAN, PA & LEIGH-ANNE MULREY , WALDER, HAYDEN & BROGAN, PA.

GARY McCARTHY, Defendant, represented by HOWARD BRUCE KLEIN , COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO USDC-NJ BAR.

DONALD MANNO, Defendant, represented by FREDERICK W. KLEPP .

LISA MURRAY-SCARFO, Defendant, represented by RICHARD SPARACO .

USA, Plaintiff, represented by ADAM LOUIS SMALL , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STEVEN J. D'AGUANNO , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, HOWARD JOSHUA WIENER , OFFICE OF THE US ATTORNEY, LISA CAROLINE PAGE , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MELISSA LYN JAMPOL , OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY & NORMAN JOEL GROSS , OFFICE OF THE US ATTORNEY.

ORDER

ROBERT B. KUGLER, District Judge.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Defendant Adler's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's February 19 Order, and the Court having considered the moving papers and responses thereto, and the Court having also considered the arguments of counsel at the August 2, 2013 hearing before the Court, and for the reasons expressed on the record on that date;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases