CAPITAL GROUP COMMUNICATIONS INC, Plaintiff,
v.
XEDAR CORP, Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 5, 2013.
August 5, 2013.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Capital Group Communications, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by David Patrick Nemecek, Jr., Qian & Nemecek LLP & Yunji Willa Qian, Qian & Nemecek LLP.
100 PCT Inc., Plaintiff, represented by David Patrick Nemecek, Jr., Qian & Nemecek LLP & Yunji Willa Qian, Qian & Nemecek LLP.
XeDAR Corp., Defendant, represented by M. Elizabeth Holt, Severson & Werson, Bennett L. Cohen, Polsinelli LLP & Philip W. Bledsoe, Polsinelli LLP.
III Hugh H. Williamson, Defendant, represented by M. Elizabeth Holt, Severson & Werson, Bennett L. Cohen, Polsinelli LLP & Philip W. Bledsoe, Polsinelli LLP.
IHS Inc., Defendant, represented by M. Elizabeth Holt, Severson & Werson, Bennett L. Cohen, Polsinelli LLP & Philip W. Bledsoe, Polsinelli LLP.
III Hugh H. Williamson, Counter-claimant, represented by M. Elizabeth Holt, Severson & Werson, Bennett L. Cohen, Polsinelli LLP & Philip W. Bledsoe, Polsinelli LLP.
XeDAR Corp., Counter-claimant, represented by M. Elizabeth Holt, Severson & Werson, Bennett L. Cohen, Polsinelli LLP & Philip W. Bledsoe, Polsinelli LLP.
IHS Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by M. Elizabeth Holt, Severson & Werson, Bennett L. Cohen, Polsinelli LLP & Philip W. Bledsoe, Polsinelli LLP.
100 PCT Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by David Patrick Nemecek, Jr., Qian & Nemecek LLP & Yunji Willa Qian, Qian & Nemecek LLP.
Capital Group Communications, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by David Patrick Nemecek, Jr., Qian & Nemecek LLP & Yunji Willa Qian, Qian & Nemecek LLP.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO DISMISS
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Alternatively Stay the Action in Favor of Arbitration. (Dkt. 16.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Defendants' motion.
I. Background
Defendant Xedar Corp. ("Xedar") is a Colorado corporation involved in geospatial technologies and government...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
