POWERS v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

Case No. 3:13-cv-295-WDS-DGW.

GREGORY POWERS and LEONARD ANTHONY CARRILLO, Plaintiff, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois.

July 30, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory Powers, Plaintiff, represented by Colin H. Dunn , Clifford Law Offices. P.C., Brad L. Badgley , Heiligenstein & Badgley, Kevin P. Durkin , Clifford Law Offices. P.C., Michael S. Krzak , Clifford Law Offices. P.C., Robert A. Clifford , Clifford Law Offices. P.C. & Sean P. Driscoll , Clifford Law Offices. P.C..

Leonard Anthony Carrillo, Plaintiff, represented by Brad L. Badgley , Heiligenstein & Badgley, Colin H. Dunn , Clifford Law Offices. P.C., Kevin P. Durkin , Clifford Law Offices. P.C., Michael S. Krzak , Clifford Law Offices. P.C., Robert A. Clifford , Clifford Law Offices. P.C. & Sean P. Driscoll , Clifford Law Offices. P.C..

CSX Transportation, Inc., Defendant, represented by Thomas H Dupree, Jr , Gibson, Dunn et al., Charles J. Swartwout , Boyle Brasher LLC, Michael C. Hermann , Boyle Brasher LLC & Michael K Murphy , Gibson, Dunn et al..

Center for Toxicology and Environmental Health, LLC, Defendant, represented by Christopher E Schaefer , Stoll Keenon et al, David J. Page , Gunty & McCarthy, Douglas C. Ballantine , Stoll Keenon et al, James P. McCarthy , Gunty & McCarthy, Patricia M Kelly , Gunty & McCarthy & Samuel D Hinkle, IV , Stoll Keenon et al.

Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jonathan Freed , Bradley & Freed, P.S.C., Kurt E. Reitz , Thompson Coburn & L Miller Grumley , Bradley, Freed & Grumley, P.S.C..

P&L Transportation, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jonathan Freed , Bradley & Freed, P.S.C., Kurt E. Reitz , Thompson Coburn & L Miller Grumley , Bradley, Freed & Grumley, P.S.C..

Four Rivers Transportation, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jonathan Freed , Bradley & Freed, P.S.C., Kurt E. Reitz , Thompson Coburn & L Miller Grumley , Bradley, Freed & Grumley, P.S.C..


ORDER

DONALD G. WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge.

Now pending before the Court are the Motion to Stay Discovery filed by Defendants on June 11, 2013 (Doc. 50) and the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Defendants on July 26, 2013 (Doc. 58). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Stay is GRANTED and the Motion for Extension is DENIED AS MOOT.

Defendants argue that discovery will be unduly burdensome in light of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases