1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 957 F.Supp.2d
  5. 957 F.Supp.2d 1102 (2013)
 

WEIGMAN v. EVEREST INSTITUTE

Civ. No. 12-1834 (RHK/JJK).

957 F.Supp.2d 1102 (2013)

Karen WEIGMAN, Plaintiff, v. EVEREST INSTITUTE, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

July 30, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michelle Dye Neumann, Phillip M. Kitzer, Halunen & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff.

Jeffrey K. Brown, Amy R. Patton, Andrew K. Haeffele, Payne & Fears LLP, Irvine, California, Steven Paul Marino, Marino Law Firm, Saint Paul, MN, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Karen Weigman filed this action against her former employer, Defendant Everest Institute ("Everest"), alleging she was terminated in violation of the Minnesota Whistleblower Act and public policy for confronting her supervisor about what she believed to be the forgery of internal documents. Everest now moves for summary judgment on Weigman's claims, and, for the reasons set forth below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases